Hundreds of applicants per role, sometimes thousands
This is the number to absorb before anything else, because it explains almost every other frustration in a search. An ordinary Dutch vacancy draws hundreds of applications. One written broadly, or at a company people want to work for, goes past a thousand. And it happens fast: the great majority arrive in the first days after the posting goes up, so a role opened two weeks ago is already being worked.
- The first conclusion, and the uncomfortable one: a CV sent through the form was not read by a person. A screening system saw it first, and it looks for textual match, not potential
- The second: applying more does not improve your odds, it dilutes them. A hundred average applications are worth less than five precise ones, because breadth cannot be verified and specificity can
- The third, and the one the whole method follows from: if the queue at the front door runs to hundreds, the work is to find a different door. An approach that arrives through a person, before the role is posted or somewhere it will never be posted at all, is not standing in that queue
- And a rejection with no reply is not a judgement on you. At these volumes an employer who does not answer is the rule rather than the exception. Read nothing into it
These numbers are an estimate from the field, not a figure quoted from a report. They come from what I see at the employers and recruiters I work with, and they move by industry and by season. The order of magnitude is the point here, not a precise number.
The full article on why a scattered search fails